Not Just ...

a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Nor War'n Tester ?



Tetra-heed-run



(fn1)/(f'n p)(fp3)
(meta 4: Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again , D&R Tan ya?)

(blog anomaly: improper spacing/seamingly adjusted[!])


[Thales] [?]



Enough Smirking!

The Sport of Stairs!
Well
 ... a bit of a Tan gent. 
Not [!]

[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short.  But you learn something everyday.  In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip.  Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports.  But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link.  It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends.  Taxes that is.  Not to mention dressage*.  Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]  

* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.

6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]


Not my original intent [!][?][?]

[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares!  Nail?  Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ...  One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]

** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law.  So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law.  In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well.  To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.

6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page. 
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]

*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?

AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention !  Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]

FOOTNOTES PAGE AUGUST 2013

Up Date: That's the ticket. 

8-2-13 The blank's the thing. A. Proxymoron?, # That is the ticket!, #?.(FP5) x. Killing Fields of Dreams, (y) Tea Party Down Grade, z. Congress- - to boldly go... ? 
8-2-13 1., 2. a., b., c., d(a), e.(We are at the table. ), f.(Update), g.House of Cards, h.  3. a. b.Killer Ad from Killer Group c.Take On The Hill! d. e.Post-Pyth F. G. h.I'm not saying... i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Just Say O! 4.MessAge 5.(Dime) a. Mmmm MOW, MOW, b.Tin Foil Herman, c. R.S.V.P.

8-4-13 VC, Vinyl Café, Vicious Cycle Virtuous Correction? Pun on VC or Victimizer Congress.
Perception Correction President(shall) Congress(shun)all?
8-5-13 : CePR? math/baker? Perception $knot Reality!

8-9-13 WAR (belated insert) Presently listening to Norman Goldman opening re: Rance Priebus and the Middle East. (5)mess+I-uh(b.s.), (7) format change, (13){Paper U?}, (21) NO!, (37) ! 

8-20-13 Back from Sekiu fishing trip, with dad, cousins, nephew and friends.
8-20-13 (a) [Aeschylus] & how buried

8-21-13 1 wiki(Miranda Warning), 2 (WSJ), 3 Trans Parent Seas, 4 Miranda Warning!, 5 The Guardian, 6 The Telegraph, 7 The Guardian(check redundancy)   Re: Oldsmobile (b.s.)

8-22-13:  That old hope and changey thing [!] (order of insert)  6 2 3 4 1 5 [7]
    (changey old hope and thing That [!]) Ribble this ? (FP2) 
8-23-13 bold added: not to Farce the Wor(l)d or parse SS oar well.
8-26-13: The (b.s.) of lemon ship is already inserted, with later untwist of mangled mixed meta for ... ?(FP2)
8-27-13 Not to pun on Too Bolds or W lines. (1 NOW, 2 The Cycle)
8-28-13 Hecuva post. (wMd?) Crtl F "spectrum" (a, b, g, i) See notes on original post and placement /timing of asterisks and links.  There is an M-bed within this FP.  But to cut the dimentionalism, there is more work. (d, w)

Anachronism

1-21-14 (no text) (saved in doc)
1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14

Pop Four?

Randi Rhodes:  Defender and Explainer of Obamanomics?
Norman Goldman:  Radical Middle?
Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin

The Poverty of Popperism, **

The Less Than Pentagonal File

A mature Log [.]

4 word [.]
 

Meta More Phosis?
Not Exactly!
 

==============================================

Randi Rhodes

No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet.  i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.

Further ow[!]

parallels-meet-religion-and-nationalism-in-the-early
when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html

1-22-14

 * Nor less regard for Thom(:) Hartmann or Rachel(:) Maddow:

Time is a funny thing.  The fourth dimension?  What about perpendicular to the 3?  But then there is the parallel of not having time to follow every tangent let alone parallels. 

**1-23-14   links titled and morphed, lines 4 and 6 added. Link(or line)5 actually read or rubric's fit ?

 

IGOPOGO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[.] = lame punctuashuns[!]
i.e. prologue / foreword (^)
 

(:) more to insert and POGO [!] ~[foot note]
 

(*) the sequal? WaPo Slate?

(^)1-24-14  i.e. prologue / foreword
Also 4 links added for 4 original personalities.(Andrea Mitchell /

PIT Spot?

Meta-cystical point or so duh?


Not to pump the mess anger or dis-road improvements. 


i.e. change of(4) course


At this point, I will refrain from inserting links to confound or unfuse the above.
My O.I. is in the Lab3ls [!]


A.  NFRY
B.  Meta-slash
C.  Ribble
4.  P.C.




RSN: Smallest Font- Unread, Normal Font- Read, Small Font (or bold)- of special interest
Nicholas Kristof New York Times, Agence France-Presse,  David Remnick, The New Yorker, Jason Rosenbaum, National Public Radio, (...under construction)   Frank Rich, New York Magazine
TO: (...Under Construction)   .Yana Kunichoff, Truthout | Interview..


Spoiler alert?  The Last Word, Howard Dean ? IBT: wps 

Hump Day?

To Re:view Page:
Original intent to retrace the War on Hillary[!] links.
Under RE:VIEWING we find: File for Facebook.(but that is a tangent)
So back to 12-2-14.  We find Culture*. Below that we find OW [!]
Then (FP1) parses the Greek. Under which I find a new anamoly.** [A Witt gen stein?]
Within FP! we have (FP2)
Under post-pyth we have more on Hillary.  Prior threads and Pythagorean work on the way.
That's the ticket. C. bad+press Other Greeks*** to Countdown. or un-Vienna Circle?
The Calculus of DOW or coneheads? (Jung, Euclid, Barlow), (Newton Liebniz Asimov), Dar Tan Ya?

But back to the parsing or back from the tangent.
~~~~
(FP1)
~~~~
 (Liebniz Dar Ching)
There is no plausible metaphilosophy. All is metaphysics. 
Wittgenstein/NewLieb/TOW: words, math, subjective  /* objective Larouche / Rand?

Manual Blog Search: Not Just ... a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Gitmo or less. ,
 Reading In Progress[***], Full Read! ?,  Hume or boo , F'N 3
[Need to review labeling of photos, images, cartoons etc]

Is the rational, math or language? 
Is subjective/objective the real ManyKey'nIsm or classical economics?
C-Shelley ? Or pre- stein.

*asterisk in original (* R.I.P.)
** leave as anamoly of [scroll over unclickable]
***  need to adjust way point(that's the ticket)

(FN!) : Starting with the last insert.(*-5) = mics? in regards to the meta-plausible.
(*-9)@ ManyKey'nIsm we (b.s.)Tryunism for 3 links in 2 posts.
A bit more anachronistic(*-1) we are Frank 'n pre-cast[!] 'n loosing the thread with C-Shelley ?
Or Shilling Schiller [!] 

Four Models(~):

 

(~) models : Milo Mulligan / The message is the mess.  (~) Para-model

Penta-meta point ?
Geo-metrics [!] ? (~)





 /*  : (2-4-14) [ / ]=subjective+objective:(b.s.) link inserted also two selected from(fp3)

Throwing the Game

or Tetrahedron.

Or should we call it die with less perspective?

Bottom line? I mean, who am I to advise the GOP, but the Pizza Guy may just be the best thing for the country. Not that I would go that far, but if he makes it to nominee, I mean, it just might be good for the national debate. At least he will have one up on the MBA president, if not the constitutional law and community organizer president. I mean just what business is the country in? Let alone what it means to grow the pie.

The other lines? Well I will work on them later, but there may be something to Jon Stewart's point, if not baiting photobombers. I don't want to run the table, but I guess that is another table.


[Post-Ribble or Meta-4: the above was written without the benefit of having followed much ofor many of the links. It was based simply on the point that we have an executive of Godfather's Pizza running for president, and it might be good for the debate. That and the pun on dice(plural) or the lesser perspectives/dimentions of the tetrahedron. But I will now add that I will also contrast in a less dimensional way, Andrew Breitbart and Jon Stewart, they only hinge on the 1st amendment. In that regard I clicked on a link at the latter's and note the "freedom of speech" and the rest of I.T.

Bocephus had a point, even though he was wrong about almost everything else. There is something strange, to say the least about Boehner and Obama playing golf, while some fiddle.

What are the odds? (I can't find where I buried the original ref: but I guess that means that Netanyahu not only might have played golf with Hitler, but he would pin a badge on him. I guess that leaves me off the Picard(cunnard) upon which Brietbart has hoisted himself.) It is not uncommon for me to lose links, but what are the odds the last thing in my email is on Cain.]

[10-6-11 update: Hank Williams Jr.-No Dylan - I agree with Hank Williams Jr. in his apology "The thought of the Leaders of both Parties Jukin and High Fiven on a Golf course, while so many Families are Struggling to get by simply made me Boil over and make a Dumb statement and I am very Sorry if it Offended anyone. I would like to Thank all my supporters. This was Not written by some Publicist." But I beg to differ on the move to get money out of politics. [The devil is in the details, and what is left out. I think the petition is flawed. While I support the intent and wish it well, what will it be replaced with? What influence will the media then have in filtering the debate? What influence will corporations then have in crafting any messages? Get money out of the news! Get money out of "free speech"! If you catch my drift.] HW Jr. used a disgusting analogy, but Dylan Ratigan's petition just falls short of being comprehensive.]
[If wishes were fishes...we'd be fed up. Bain or cut bait, and candy and nuts.]

Pre-Pan FRY.

i.e. NOT Fully Read Yet.
Pan= God of asterisks.***
BushNix unite[!]

That was lede or ship, or a spoiler alert of a headline. 
But I am going to stick my neck out or guess the point of what George Lakoff* may be meaning by Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.

But first I will be facitious** or tongue in cheek, which with the opposition such as it Roves and the Techs- Ass Governor as a frame of reference it may be closer to the reality.

A. They are elephants.
B. It is trickle down.
C. It is politics.
D. All of the above.

* apologies he has not had a Label
** I am at a striking disadvantage having read a book of his
[Now for the read.]
*** Ctrl F (kitchen)

[Now I will comment: Clause^ Wits and Meta4Wars[!]
(fn)

^  post (fn)
[Buy George, that war on X-mass.]

[Thanks to Norman Goldman and a caller
 for additional inspiration for a new metaFor,
the Fiscal Crypt.(see bubble analogy and 4moolah[!])]

Not to bury but...

Owe but I did. 

Knot to mention di-Spencered with.*

Con Text
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/david-vitter-alan-grayson-bills-101965.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins385842.html

Meta-4's
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/busted_10_myths_that_reveal_just_how_dangerous_the_nsa_really_is_partner/?source=newsletter **
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/paul_krugman_republicans_are_enemies_of_americas_poor/?source=newsletter

http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/no_christies_scandal_is_not_like_benghazi_why_the_rights_defense_is_doomed/?source=newsletter
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/chris_christies_forgiving_fan_club_why_elite_centrists_will_back_him_all_the_way/?source=newsletter

Salt Lick?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borate
http://inogolo.com/audio/Wittgenstein_4139.mp3


* Having browsed the busted myth and read the Krugman, and contexted the mess, I accidently deleted, so the above is a revamp(Or V-ramp) of sorts, to reprocess later. 

** I may have mitt-flopped the original Salon selections, Akin to progress and chem mystery.

Footnote***--- me: "I like the context you put it in". kNot said yet.  

*** alternet point of deparcher[!]{!}

Parallel Fields. ? (Re: Con Text i.e. GOTO Hegel?)

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/21113-disimagination-machines-and-punishing-factories-in-the-age-of-casino-capitalism
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21197-noam-chomsky-on-the-legacy-of-ariel-sharon-not-speaking-ill-of-the-dead-imposes-a-vow-of-silence
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21198-fifty-years-later-the-war-on-poverty-working-better-than-the-right-or-left-will-admit
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21199-turkey-in-crisis-understanding-the-erdogan-gulen-split

These I have barely dug into.  And I have left the paddle ING to you.

Fear and Running

in the Republican Party. 
It could be said that the 1st Amendment of the constitution kills more than the 2nd Amendment.

Amendment 1-  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 2-  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I was going to go with "gunning" instead of "running", but I did not want it to suggest* a 2nd Amendment solution.  But with Romney running on an ad that misunderstands English, that is only one bullet point to my argument.  "You didn't build that." is completely out of context**.  But out of context does not necessarily mean misleading.*** 

Post asterisks:  The impact of the first amendment on what gets done has more impact on life and death than the fallacy that anyone is going to kill the second amendment.[**]

* b.s. (blog search) to be footnoted
** (no pun on con text but I need to replace[*] the Daily Rundown links)
*** not to suggest (not exactly)
[*] close enough for blog work
[**] There are very constitutional reasons for the political calculus of this rhetoric to influence and create reality.  But from another dimention, NorMan GoldMan has a rhetorical rant (not not it) that could fit Romney's rhetorical style in a silly Obama ad that could decimate [***] the Romney race.
[***] Pardon the Palin term, but not her.

[Post bracketed asterisks: regarding the NG rant, "that" is not quite "it" but on target, in more ways than one.  But in appreciation of the nature of our progress, it is not about any new legislation.  It is not about obliterating the constitution or its amendments or even new amendments.  Old taxes and legislation are always on the table, for all three branches of government, and the people are the deciders. C-heading and lede!]

[Follow-up of sorts.  But first a note on "gunning" as a rhetorical term.  I'm sorry I can't give proper credit, but it may be embedded in the links above.  However, Lawrence O'Donnell, noting the Brian Williams interview of Romney was not my original follow-up, but may be on target (That is not a course.) Ouch.  Guns don't kill people, people do.  Find them(Ctrl F)? What about the law?  Not for the silly season, or gatlin salad?  And oh no, not atTax of the meta4rhetoric.  I really think there is a problem with the use of Senator Thelma for Patty Murray, since she puts Boehnor at the wheel.]
[Transparency Destroyed?]
[Re-sorts of sorts... sort of, or not, of course.  This was basically an exercise in logging some clips of some MSNBC shows.]

[My best to Wendy & Ed Schultz!]

[7-26-12: update and effect (label)]
[Scroll up to "Post bracketed"]